<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Widespread Solutions - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-2c4556e6" type="application/json"/><link>http://widespreadsolutions.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:40:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is This What They Call Key Word Stuffiing?</title><link>http://www.widespreadsolutions.com/2009/08/30/is-this-what-they-call-key-word-stuffiing/#comment-15646586</link><description>I don't think Avidian would be too impressed to be associated with this kind of copy. Maybe they were themselves responsible for this crappy copywriting?! Doing themselves a disservice whoever wrote it, anyway..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;cheers&lt;br&gt;Perry&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.SmallBizCRM.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.SmallBizCRM.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PerryN</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:40:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is This What They Call Key Word Stuffiing?</title><link>http://www.widespreadsolutions.com/2009/08/30/is-this-what-they-call-key-word-stuffiing/#comment-15646057</link><description>Perry thanks for stopping by and taking the trouble to comment.  I thought the article was hilarious.  Whoever wrote it didn't bother to anticipate what the reader might think, exactly as you've pointed out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frontofficebox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is This What They Call Key Word Stuffiing?</title><link>http://www.widespreadsolutions.com/2009/08/30/is-this-what-they-call-key-word-stuffiing/#comment-15631912</link><description>Excellent example! This sort of keyword stuffing might have worked in 2003, although you would still have had a high bounce rate back then - this kind of copy wouldn't inspire you to read any further..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PerryN</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does SEO Work Anymore</title><link>http://www.widespreadsolutions.com/2009/07/22/does-seo-work-anymore/#comment-14964088</link><description>Hi Andy&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thanks for stopping by and taking the trouble to comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand the issues about site design of course, but my question remains the same - how can anybody SEO for 400+ different questions?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've been all over this for pretty much the last year.  At least in our field only the very longest of long tail words don't have overwhelming levels of competition.  I have number one ranking on several long tail keywords but that accounts for only around 5% of my search traffic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you have a secret sauce for this I'l be pleased to here about it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">frontofficebox</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does SEO Work Anymore</title><link>http://www.widespreadsolutions.com/2009/07/22/does-seo-work-anymore/#comment-14953059</link><description>A mere online presence won’t serve the purpose of reaching out and impressing your target audience, to beat the competition you need a well designed website with a good search rank and for that you need help of companies which provide complete solutions in &lt;a href="http://www.vsworld.com/?loadSwf=swf/webDevelopment.swf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.vsworld.com/?loadSwf=swf/webDevelopm...&lt;/a&gt; website designing and development and &lt;a href="http://www.vsworld.com/?loadSwf=swf/seo_sem.swf" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.vsworld.com/?loadSwf=swf/seo_sem.swf&lt;/a&gt; search engine optimization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">web designing seo development</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>